Construction News

Sun November 28 2021

Related Information

House-builder fined £200,000 for pollution

3 days Miller Homes Limited has been fined £200,000 after polluting a Huddersfield watercourse for more than 1km.

Images show the watercourse downstream of the discharge
Images show the watercourse downstream of the discharge

Miller Homes Limited pleaded guilty to polluting a tributary of Grimescar Dyke with silt at Lindley Park on 8 February 2018. appeared where it

It was fined £200,000 at Leeds Magistrates’ Court on 23rd November, and ordered to pay costs of more than £8,500 and a victim surcharge of £170.

The magistrates heard that Miller Homes bought the land for a residential housing development in 2012. The site includes a series of tanks and lagoons for flood prevention measures.

Miller Homes was previously fined £100,000 in 2016 for a similar offence at the same site in 2013, after which it brought in new procedures.

Following reports of discolouration of Grimescar Dyke on 8th February 2018, an Environment Agency investigation traced the source of the silt pollution to an underground tank on the Miller Homes site, which is part of the development’s flood prevention measures.

Miller Homes said that it had the site drainage infrastructure cleared by a contractor and this activity could have potentially impacted on the discharge from the tank.

Related Information

The silt discharge impacted Grimescar Dyke for at least 1.2km. Silt pollution is hazardous to fish, blocking their gills and damaging breeding grounds. It can also damage the habitats that aquatic insects, vital food for a number of species, depend on.

Water samples taken during the initial investigation recorded 647 milligrams of suspended solids in a litre of water (mg/l). A healthy watercourse has less than 30mg/l. A water sample from the tank on site was found to contain 191,000mg/l of suspended solids

Andy Swettenham, environment management team leader for the Environment Agency, said: “Miller Homes Limited did not follow its own management procedures, put in place after a previous conviction.

“Their own procedures dictate that the site should have a site specific environment plan and associated surface water management plan. These plans did exist but were not sufficient to prevent the pollution.

“This case emphasises the need not only for companies to have a comprehensive water management and pollution prevention plan in place but also to ensure it is fully implemented and all activities on site are properly supervised and monitored. If a member of the public had not reported this to us then the impact of the pollution could have been far worse.”

Got a story? Email


Click here to view more construction news »